39/23
Kiefer Sutherland got the role by writing to Clint Eastwood about how big of a fan he was, and that he wanted to star in one of his films before he retired
Scenario
While serving as a juror in a high-profile murder trial, family man Justin Kemp finds himself grappling with a serious moral dilemma… one that he could use to influence the jury’s verdict and potentially convict – or free – the wrong killer.
The story focuses on a jury member facing an internal conflict that raises compelling questions about duty and conscience
Juror #2 is a decent watch that brings a thought-provoking moral dilemma to the screen, though it falls short of its potential.
For those unfamiliar with such moral dilemmas, the narrative may actually feel fresh and engaging, and it’s easy to see why many viewers found it intriguing
However, the emotional portrayal is disappointing; despite the weight of his decision, the protagonist seems strangely distant, which lessens the intensity and limits the viewer’s engagement.
Ultimately, Juror #2 presents a solid premise with an interesting conflict, but its muted execution and slow pace make it less impactful than it could have been
Those well-versed in philosophy or psychology may find the film’s moral tension lacking in depth, leaving them to focus on the character development—which, unfortunately, is also lacking.